Because the Cowboys limp away from their season-ending loss at Levi’s Stadium, some actually, an unsure future awaits many. Within the wage cap period, rosters are all the time going to see their fair proportion of churn, in order that’s nothing new. However this winter may see main upheaval in Dallas’ teaching ranks as properly.
Instantly following the 19-12 loss to the 49ers within the NFC divisional spherical, proprietor Jerry Jones spoke to reporters, making certain nothing has modified relating to his endorsement of his head coach. Mike McCarthy’s job safety was first known as into query earlier than the postseason started. As an alternative of hedging or deflecting, Jones gave a reasonably sturdy endorsement saying “No. I don’t even want to – no.” After the loss to San Francisco, Jones doubled-down on his help of his head coach. Requested if he modified his thoughts relating to McCarthy, Jones replied, “No, no, no, in no way.”
However behind McCarthy, down the teaching ranks, something can occur. Despite getting a significant raise to remain on because the defensive coordinator in 2022, Dan Quinn could possibly be on his means out. Quinn is among the many main candidates to land the Denver Broncos’ open place. He lately interviewed with the Colts and will very properly obtain a number of affords earlier than all is alleged and accomplished.
Kellen Moore, the Cowboys offensive coordinator, has drawn curiosity as properly. The 34-year-old play-caller is considerably maligned in Dallas, however held in excessive regard across the league. He’ll interview for the vacant spot in Carolina, at a minimal.
Contemplating all of this, there’s a very actual probability the Cowboys lose each coordinators and parts of their respective staffs in coming weeks. Some may see this as a very good factor, however in an age the place stability is king and the grass isn’t all the time greener on the opposite facet, main upheaval may set Dallas again.
It’s not unrealistic to think about Dallas can have vital churn of their teaching ranks. Not due to underachieving performers however as a result of they had been profitable and acquired higher affords elsewhere.
An vital distinction to remember.