Goldman’s Dees Says Musk 2018 Go-Non-public Tweet Shocked Him

(Bloomberg) — Dan Dees, one among Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s most senior executives, advised a jury he was shocked in August 2018 by Elon Musk’s tweet about taking Tesla Inc. non-public, including to proof at a securities fraud trial that the automotive firm CEO’s announcement caught even his bankers off guard.

Most Learn from Bloomberg

The trial, now in its second week in San Francisco federal courtroom, revolves round Musk’s controversial August 2018 Twitter posts that he was contemplating taking the electric-car maker non-public with “funding secured.”

Legal professionals for the buyers are aiming with testimony from Dees, who’s a co-head of Goldman’s banking and markets division, and Egon Durban, the co-chief govt officer of personal fairness agency Silver Lake Administration, to point out that Musk’s tweets had been untimely — and constituted a violation of securities legal guidelines — as a result of the bankers had been barely consulted and hadn’t formally signed on to his take-private plan.

Dees and Durban advised jurors Friday that even per week after Musk’s “funding secured” tweet on Aug. 7, 2018, they had been nonetheless working to determine how the deal could be structured, together with who would pay for it.

“I used to be shocked he was taking Tesla non-public,” Dees testified about what he was pondering when he noticed Musk’s tweet. “I used to be shocked we weren’t concerned at Goldman.” Later, after they’d had an opportunity to debate the deal, Musk disclosed Goldman’s involvement publicly earlier than the funding financial institution was able to announce it, Dees mentioned.

Musk has testified the Aug. 7, 2018, tweet was “completely truthful,” touting what he described as an “unequivocal” dedication by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund to again the go-private plan with billions of {dollars} — although he had nothing in writing.

In an Aug. 11, 2018, e-mail to Dees, Musk mentioned he wished to “put collectively a various sufficient investor/lender group, such that no single investor can demand particular phrases.” Musk mentioned Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund may finance the deal alone, “however they might require that we construct a Gigafactory there earlier than we would favor.”

Earlier than Dees took the stand, Durban recalled for the jury a dialog by which he advised Musk $6 billion was essentially the most Silver Lake may decide to the transaction — which he mentioned would have been the second- or third-biggest funding around the agency had ever accomplished. Jurors have beforehand been advised the take-private plan would have value about $60 billion.

Durban additionally mentioned that in his profession, he hadn’t seen a transaction with the “distinctive” construction Musk was proposing, by which buyers within the public firm could be rolled over into the non-public one. He mentioned it’s “atypical” for a CEO to announce such a transaction as he’s nonetheless contemplating it, whereas additionally explaining that the $420-a-share value goal was anticipated as a result of it mirrored a 20% premium on Tesla’s inventory value.

“We had simply spoke the evening earlier than,” the Silver Lake boss mentioned, noting that they deliberate to fulfill later that very same week. Like Dees, Durban advised the jury he didn’t assume financing could be an impediment, primarily based on his years of expertise working with funders.

The jury was proven an e-mail change between Dees and Musk beginning on the identical day the Tesla CEO tweeted about taking Tesla non-public.

“At GS, we’re standing by and able to assist,” Dees tells Musk. “We’re able to fly in and share some views and dig in to assist everytime you’re prepared.”

Musk responds: “Sounds good. Will name as quickly as I’ve a spare second.”

Finally, in a report offered to Tesla’s board Aug. 23, Dees, Durban and a 3rd adviser mentioned the automotive maker “could be higher persevering with as a public firm than going via the method of a going non-public transaction.”

Learn Extra: Musk-Tesla Tweet Fraud Accusers Say, He Confused Jury 10 Occasions

Ryan Brinkman, an auto analyst at JPMorgan Chase & Co., testified Friday he was so shocked by Musk’s preliminary tweet he puzzled whether or not the CEO’s Twitter account had been hacked.

“It didn’t seem to make an entire lot of sense,” he mentioned. “Additionally I used to be doubting how this might work.” Inside a half hour, he got here to consider the submit was actual. “It was notable to me that it was on a Tesla company web site,” he mentioned.

By Aug, 23, Brinkman concluded in a report that Musk’s going non-public “story appeared to disintegrate.” He reversed his earlier resolution to boost Tesla’s goal value from $195 to $308.

In an e-mail proven to jurors, Brinkman advised a colleague it was a “robust name” to dial again the worth goal. The transfer was tantamount to calling Musk out, to saying “the CEO had lied or misled buyers,” he advised jurors. “I used to be sticking my neck out.”

(Updates with testimony by JPMorgan analyst)

Most Learn from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

Previous post Sean Payton ‘positively remains to be in play’ for Cardinals and Broncos head coach searches
Next post Christie Brinkley, 68, Turns up the Warmth With “Sizzling,” “Topless” Image and Followers Have Ideas